The photographs support a visible courtyard connection, without awaiting MI-02/03.

Whole fields 15 and 16 simultaneously show support heads, the occupied tier above them, its broad single window, the projecting underside above that tier, and the upper broad/narrow window corner. Field 19 corroborates the direction toward the street gate and the three openings along the lower returning wall. The row of supports follows that returning wall; it does not run beneath the broad upper face. These are visual correspondences, not calibrated endpoints.

Field 16 visual locators in the 1152 × 2048 original (approximate pixels, not measurements): upper projecting corner near (618,965); its underside meets the recessed tier near (710,1050); lower tier/soffit edge runs roughly (375,1390) through (743,1400) toward (906,1470); the three pale uprights descend below this edge. The broad lower window near (260,1120) differs from both the broad upper stack and the shaded ground windows. Field 15 repeats this chain with the upper projection around (714,583), recessed tier corner around (808,680), and lower tier edge near y=1020–1105. Field 19 shows the same sequence toward the gate. These coordinates are navigation aids selected by eye, not photogrammetric control points.

The adopted local correspondence is a quarter turn of the stage428 support row: (x,y,z) becomes (2.8-y,x+4.5,z). Stage430 upper geometry receives only a vertical shift +8.1. Neither fragment is scaled or deformed. Equating their arbitrary unit conventions at scale 1 is itself an explicit by-eye assumption. The three support faces/returns and original soffit retain their geometry under that rigid transform. Two short stage428 context strips are superseded within this new assembly: they were cut context, not a surveyed face map. In particular its end strip is not proof of the stair-side lower broad face. Original files and original live studies remain intact.

The lower tier is redrafted with a broad face at y=1.2, a returning face at x=3.3, bottom z=4.4 and top z=8.1. Its height 3.7, overhang depth 1.2, right-angle planes and all four lower apertures are drafting assumptions. One narrow upright window is on the broad tier; two narrow and one wider opening are on its return. The four have true wall cutouts, reveals, sills and plain inset glazing; no interior division is asserted. Six inherited upper apertures remain unchanged under translation. No light tube, blind, reflection, vent, downpipe or service conduit supplies additional architectural geometry.

The overhang underside visibly joins the upper broad face to the recessed tier. The lower return meets the inherited support soffit outer edge. Upper return geometry intentionally ends at its inherited y=2.1 study cut; the photographed farther upper broad stack is omitted. Lower return ends at y=7.8, also a cut, not a full wall end. The uppermost edge remains a study cut, not an asserted roofline. No wall backs, solid floor/slab thickness, caps, rear soffit joint, foundations, ground, stairs or city/entrance transform is added.

This answers the visible-courtyard reconciliation only. MI-01/02/03 remain relevant to the concealed signed-entrance wall and a common entrance/rear frame; their absence does not block this visible local composition. It is not a metric registration, surveyed attachment or completed building. Ground variation and relative scale remain approximate.

Before/after uses matched model cameras. Before retains all 101 inherited surfaces, displayed in the new proposed alignment, with the new connecting surfaces absent. It is an explicitly constructed comparison state, not the previously published joined building (none existed). After has 166 meshes / 366 triangles / no textures. The historical independent viewers remain available as the actual previous state. Street view uses 1.7 arbitrary units, not metres or recovered eye height.

Eva Baruch / SwitchUp first-party photographs; 17 September 2026 per owner handoff, no EXIF. No source image changed. INTERNAL-REVIEW-ONLY / EXTERNAL_DISTRIBUTION_BLOCKED applies to the approximate review. Standing restrictions on Google, Simplex, BSR, MYS, Baitvenoy, article and portfolio pixels remain; Project TLV and Ashtrom supply no texture.